It has an extremely customizable media library and allows you to rip and burn your favorite music CDs. Winamp has always embodied the values of empowerment and a deep passion for music A media player with a heritage, and a vibrant community of 80 million active users worldwide today. The app supports playback of many audio (MP3, OGG, AAC, WAV, MOD, XM, S3M, IT, MIDI, etc) and video types (AVI, ASF, MPEG, NSV). It also plays streamed video and audio content, both live and recorded, authored worldwide. It supports numerous audio and video formats. If it scrolls as smoothly as iTunes, I'll be amazed.Winamp is a free multimedia player made by Nullsoft. Go ahead, grab almost any alternative music player for OS X and throw in a 20k song library. I always check out alternatives when they come up for OS X and they are always much worse in very simple areas, like scrolling. I'm quite picky about my applications and I've been using it every day for around 10 years now. As someone who has used it since version one in Mac OS 9, it's really not that bad. IMO iTunes gets an excessive amount of over the top flak from techie types. Still, it can be buggy and slow and that is easy to judge even with nothing to directly compare it to. But to be fair, nothing besides iTunes even tries to do device management as comprehensively, so there is little to compare it to. IOS device management is as flaky on Windows as it is on Mac OS X, which is what they have in common and one of the most frequent complaints. As a result, it's a pretty bad library based music player in Windows (although nowhere close to as bad as people make it out to be). The Windows version is slower, buggier and less responsive. ITunes for Mac is a great music player/jukebox. * Watch folders, which, if it wasn't ugly, would be reason enough to use it. In iTunes, if you start playing a Beatles song, then search for "The Clash", if that Beatles song ends, it will not go to the next Beatles song, because the original song is no longer visible. * When the track changes, if you have searched for something, it doesn't just stop like iTunes. This is one of the most annoying features in iTunes. * When the track changes, this list doesn't snap back to the new song. * For some reason there is a prominent button to show the "About" dialog. iTunes calls the manner of sorting that I suggest "album by artist". I'm not sure what secondary ordering its actually using - it's not alphabetical by track or ordered by track number (all 1, all 2. * Sorting by artist seems to be broken - if I sort by artist, it should logically order each artist's albums alphabetically as well. Is this really something that people care about? * The largest UI element is the number of seconds that have elapsed in the current song. I guess they would have to spend some time drawing a completely custom button. * No fullscreen on Lion - this takes, literally, 5 minutes to add. * I couldn't figure out how to hide "Genre", which I strongly dislike, and "Year", which I don't care about. It has the exact same elements in the exact same places, except Winamp looks like a tacky GTK+ theme. * Visuals aside, the UI is basically iTunes. As far as I can tell, it's mostly just an ugly version of iTunes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |